Supreme Court allows closely-held for-profit companies to exclude contraceptive coverage
June 30, 2014
In a 5-4 decision, today the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that closely-held, for-profit corporations cannot be required to provide the contraceptive coverage mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) if coverage of contraceptives violates the sincerely held religious beliefs of the companies’ owners.
The Court was careful to point out the limited scope of its decision:
- It applies only to closely-held companies with very few shareholders. It does not apply to larger, publicly-traded, for-profit companies, and it does not change the current contraceptive requirements for other employers.
- It applies only to the PPACA contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to apply to other insurance coverage mandates that conflict with an employer’s religious beliefs.
- It also does not allow discrimination based on religious objections.
The Supreme Court decision suggested that employees of these companies may be able to access contraceptive coverage in the same way that employees of religious non-profit organizations do. While the employer is not required to provide or pay for coverage, separate contraceptive coverage can be provided by the insurer or plan administrator.
Cigna expects guidance from the Department of Health and Human Services clarifying how this ruling will impact the administration of contraceptive coverage.
For the latest information on health care reform, we encourage you to bookmark our health care reform website, InformedOnReform.com.
SEE ALL NEWS ALERTS
Stay up-to-date with health care reform announcements and breaking news. Read our news articles and discover how rules may affect you or your business.
Read answers to frequently asked questions about health care reform.